Myanmar’s strict COVID prevention regulations

As of July 8th, Myanmar has has a total of 316 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and 6 deaths. Their cases spiked in early April with a little over 100 cases appearing in a span of two weeks. But what accounts for the low case count? (If such a low case count can be trusted—many experts and observers questioned government narratives of a coronavirus-free Burma in March, and some have been skeptical of official statistics since then, suggesting they reflect limited testing capacity rather than absence of the virus.)

A key element of Myanmar’s response has been strict curfew and quarantine laws. Since March, over 500 people have been sentenced to between one month and a year in prison for violations of these laws, including children, returning migrant workers, and religious minorities. Authorities have charged hundreds for these violations, with some resulting in fines. However, imprisoning people for violating curfews, quarantine, and physical distancing have disproportionately affected certain communities and are seen as counterproductive in reducing threats to public health.

“Limiting public health risks through social distancing is crucial, but jailing people for being outside at night just adds to everybody’s risks,” Phil Robertson, a deputy Asia direction at Human Rights Watch, said. “Throwing hundreds behinds bars in crowded, unhygienic prisons defeats the purpose of containing the spread of Covid-19.”

In March, authorities announced several directives and restrictions which included a mandatory 28-day quarantine for foreign arrivals, nighttime curfews, bans of gatherings of over five people, and several township-level lockdowns.

Some citizens in villages say that they were unaware of the pandemic, as they were still affected by the internet shutdown that began a year ago due to fighting between the military and the Rakhine, an ethnic minority in the country. “With armed conflict between the Myanmar military and Arakan Army in Rakhine State amid a pandemic, it’s critical for civilians to get the information needed to stay safe,” said Linda Lakhdhir, Asia legal adviser at Human Rights Watch. Between the Scylla of armed conflict and Charybdis of coronavirus, women in Rakhine State have been particularly vulnerable.

The government had blocked many independent and ethnic news sites saying they were supplying “fake news.” However, concerns are being raised by independent rights watchdogs as these blockings prevent access to COVID-19 information, protocols on self-quarantine, and other practices to restrict the spread.

Authors: Camryn Thomas and Kevin W. Fogg

Rumor, Chinese Diets, and Covid-19: Questions and Answers about Chinese Food and Eating Habits

Posted by Carolina Asia Center on Thursday, May 14, 2020

 

A Live, Online Panel sponsored by the Carolina Asia Center and the UNC Department of History.

The current pandemic has brought fresh attention—much of it based on negative stereotypes—to Chinese cultures of food and hygiene. Ranging from debunked rumors of “bat soup” in Wuhan[1] to the eschewing of Asian food in the US early in the pandemic,[2] the diet of an imagined “Chinese people” writ large has become a source of fascination, revulsion, and moral discussion. Alongside a very real concern that bats, pangolins, or another animal may have been the initial reservoir for the deadly COVID-19 virus,[3] a rolling ball of moral concern has “spilled over” to other Chinese eating habits completely unrelated to the Coronavirus outbreak. Questions of hygiene and food culture have a long and storied history in China-global relations, ranging from the hygienic practices of colonial powers in Chinese treaty ports to the xenophobic behavior of California residents who labeled Chinese immigrants as “rat-eaters.”[4] In this panel, three experts on Chinese food history and history of medicine will discuss how and why real public health concerns over sanitary conditions in Chinese wet markets, loosely related health concerns over the consumption of wild animals worldwide, and completely unrelated aspects of the Chinese diet have been bundled into one, dangerously racialized moral discourse in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. The panel will also provide insight on how the reappearance of such a narrative may affect the future of global relations with China.

Discussants:

Michelle King, Associate Professor, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Dept. of History

Wendy Jia-Chen Fu, Assistant Professor, Emory University, Dept. of Russian and East Asian Languages and Cultures

Miranda Brown, Professor, University of Michigan, Dept. of Asian Languages and Cultures

Moderator:

Donald Santacaterina, doctoral candidate, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Dept. of History

For referenced materials, please click here.


[1] https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/01/27/coronavirus-covid19-dont-blame-bat-soup-for-the-virus/
[2] https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/food/amid-coronavirus-fears-chinese-restaurants-report-a-drop-in-business/2020/02/14/2c7d7efe-4e8f-11ea-bf44-f5043eb3918a_story.html
[3] American Chemical Society. “Missing link in coronavirus jump from bats to humans could be pangolins, not snakes.” ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 26 March 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/26/science/pangolin-coronavirus.html
[4] Ruth Rogaski, Hygienic Modernity: Meanings of Health and Disease in Treaty Port China (Berkeley: University of California Pres, 2004). See also Andrew Coe, Chop Suey: A Cultural History of Chinese Food in the United States (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 114.

“Yellow Peril” & Anti-Asian Prejudice in the Shadow of Coronavirus Panel Video

"Yellow Peril" and Anti-Asian Prejudice in the Shadow of Coronavirus

Thank you all much for joining us for this powerful and insightful panel discussion on "Yellow Peril" and Anti-Asian Prejudice in the Shadow of Coronavirus. The recorded video is below so please feel free to share it with your networks! Slides will be available here: http://go.unc.edu/prejudiceCOVID19slides Thank you once again to our amazing panelists Barb Lee, Dr. Heidi Kim, and moderator Sophie To!!!!!

Posted by Carolina Asia Center on Tuesday, March 31, 2020

 

Since the COVID-19 (popularized as simply “coronavirus”) outbreak began spreading from Wuhan, China in December 2019, anti-Asian prejudice has become painfully visible in daily life, echoing the “Yellow Peril” rhetoric of the 19th century. News and social media are bursting with cruel jokes and misinformation about Asians—from mocking what they eat to assuming that they are agents of contagion. These stereotypes are not only offensive and hurtful; they perpetuate underlying institutionalized racism and xenophobia. This panel will discuss recent episodes of anti-Asian prejudice in historical perspective, and debate how the global coronavirus scare is impacting the conversation.

Panelists: Barbara Lee, Founder and President at Point Made Learning, and Heidi Kim, Associate Professor of English and Comparative Literature, UNC Chapel Hill

Moderator: Sophie Bao-Chieu To, PhD student, Gillings School of Global Public Health

Slides: http://go.unc.edu/prejudiceCOVID19slides